Not Recommending Micro Focus on Facebook

Let us see if Facebook review are in any way, or subject to the same collusions as does Indeed.

We got a setup to post the following review of Micro Focus: https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=1394722364308814&id=100013131904205

Let’s see if it survives better than Indeed review of Micro Focus, with Indeed clearly colluding with Micro Focus to prevent damaging reviews and here.

The whole Micro Focus terrible behavior and practices is described here: Micro Focus: How to not do the right thing. You don’t want to be employed or do Business with Micro Focus.

Text:

X doesn’t recommend Micro Focus.

Shared with Public

Micro Focus made a mistake with enrollment for some of its benefits, yet confirmed them. They then modified the committed benefits, including supplementals that can be carried over year to year or when the employee leaves the company. They did that by modifying the statement committed to and back dating to that data, also as a way that seemed to cover up the changes. It affected multiple employees, many probably never noticed.

Micro Focus HR benefits played the clock to try to convince that error does not matter with the next year enrollment which is not true for supplement life insurance. They claimed they could resolved and couldn’t. Some employees did cancel existing life insurance and now have lost the coverage. Micro Focus offered no way to restore the coverage, other than with extra pain and risk during the pandemic and state lock down.

Micro Focus never followed up on paying for damage of lost coverage. When HR was reported (whistle blow) for document tampering, fraud and cover up, they threatened, with mock litigation language, through outside legal counsel supposed to discuss why Micro Focus would not have to be accountable. Answer never discussed breach of commitments, and damages due to reasonable reliance, only that ERISA law would protect, yet that is a different topic. Never mind that life insurance coverage was lost during pandemic when risk are high. Whistle blowing investigation and legal justification were driven by the head of litigations!

All that despite a no-retaliation policy. It could be construed that with such actions, Micro Focus attempted to push not older employees which have otherwise stellar records but are expensive. Clearly Micro Focus does not care as it disinvest widely everywhere including in business-critical investments.

Employees and future employee should run from Micro Focus. Why work for a company that does not care. Customer should wonder if they can trust companies that drive crazy audits of its customers but don’t respect their own commitments.

Post:

Let’s see if it will remain available!